



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An analysis of the concentration and consolidation trends in the U.S. meatpacking industry, with a focus on cattle and hog slaughter. Using data from the Census Bureau and the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), the document reveals the dramatic increase in concentration ratios for the four largest firms in cattle and hog slaughter over the past few decades. The document also discusses the emergence of large plants and their impact on industry concentration.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
(^9) There are many potential concentration measures. The four-firm
ratio is easy for statistical agencies to compute and provides confi- dentiality to individual firms. For those reasons, the measure has for several decades been calculated for many industries by Federal statistical agencies.
(^10) The classes are defined by the Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC), a hierarchical coding for products and establishments in the economy. Establishments that primarily process food products are assigned to the two-digit SIC code “20”; those food processors that specialize in meat slaughter and processing are assigned to the three-digit class “201.” Establishments that slaughter any live cat- tle, hogs, horses, or sheep and lambs are then assigned to the four- digit industry “2011”(those that process or slaughter poultry are assigned to “2015”). Finally, slaughter products from these plants are assigned to five-digit product classes: “20111” for cattle, “20114” for hogs, “20151” for chickens, and “20153”for turkeys. Our concentration measures are based on shipments from estab- lishments assigned to the five-digit slaughter product classes.
(^11) About 10 percent of U.S. manufacturing industries are more concentrated than cattle slaughter, while the other three slaughter classes are close to the mean for manufacturing.
Consolidation Into Large Plants
Slaughter industry
Census year Cattle Hogs Chickens Turkeys
1963 26 33 14 23 1967 26 30 23 28 1972 30 32 18 41 1977 25 31 22 41 1982 44 31 32 40 1987 58 30 42 38 1992 71 43 41 45
Source: Longitudinal Research Database, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Slaughter class Cattle Boxed fed Hogs Sheep and Year (^) Cows/bulls Steers/heifers All beef lambs
Ratio 1980 10 36 28 53 34 56 1982 9 41 32 59 36 44 1987 20 67 54 80 37 75 1992 22 78 64 81 44 78 1997 31 80 70 83 54 62
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture (1999).
Appendix 3A: Sources of Establishment Data for Livestock Slaughter
Cattle Hogs
Plant category Number Percent of commercial Number Percent of commercial
All commercial plants 32,874 100.0 94,889 100. Federally inspected 32,094 97.6 92,611 97. Reporting to GIPSA 31,200 94.9 91,550 96. Census, SIC 2011 31,068 94.5 86,308 91.
Sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997), and Longitudinal Research Database, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Reporting system
Year GIPSA Federally Census, inspected SIC 2011 Number
1977 1,000 1,682 2, 1982 884 1,688 1, 1987 722 1,483 1, 1992 569 1,125 1, 1996 418 988 nr
Sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997), and Longitudinal Research Database, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Cattle Hogs Year Census GIPSA FSIS Census GIPSA FSIS
Number 1963 1,817 nr nr 1,410 nr nr 1967 1,031 nr nr 797 nr nr 1972 782 920 nr 575 594 nr 1977 598 814 1,568 404 469 1, 1982 391 632 1,506 325 466 1, 1987 265 474 1,317 214 352 1, 1992 215 342 971 182 300 921 1996 nr 274 812 nr 232 770
nr = not reported Census refers to Census of Manufactures (“cattle” covers plants pri- marily producing in SIC 20111, while “hogs” covers plants primarily producing in SIC 20114). Sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997), and Longitudinal Research Database, U.S. Bureau of the Census.