


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A three-day lesson sequence designed to help students distinguish between prose and verse in early modern plays, specifically in christopher marlowe's the massacre at paris. The sequence involves analyzing the original playbook's messy lineation in the electronic text center's digital anthology of early modern english drama (emed), examining the roles of early modern printers and contemporary editors in lineation, and reflecting on the textual authority of the original print edition. Students will engage in small group discussions, create critical editions, and write short essays.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Bernadette Myers, Columbia University Robert Yates, Georgetown University
Many early modern literature courses alert students to distinctions between prose and verse, particularly when both forms occur in the same text. With this in mind, we propose a sequence of lessons, which might be integrated into a broader early modern literature course that uses digital tools to
● review the distinctions between prose and verse ● complicate the terms “prose” and “verse” ● teach how one develops an argumentative, interpretive thesis rooted in analysis of text structure ● situate texts in the context of material production
Students will review the distinctions between prose and verse in early modern plays through a close analysis of Christopher Marlowe’s The Massacre at Paris.
Students will examine the EMED’s preservation of the original playbook’s messy lineation in order to theorize the shifting use and function of prose and verse lines.
Student will analyze the role of early modern printers and contemporary editors in (re)lineating and thus remediating the text.
Time: Three 45-minute class periods.
Materials: The Folger’s A Digital Anthology Early Modern English Drama (EMED) The Massacre at Paris , Christopher Marlow The Puritan , W.S. (later attributed to Thomas Middleton) Christopher Marlowe: The Complete Plays (Penguin Classics edition) The puritan; or, the widow of Watling-Street (EEBO edition)
Assessment Description:
a. Short essay: Reflect on the textual authority of Massacre in the original print edition, reflected in the EMED edition as well. Why might we, or other editors, want to re-lineate a line when the original printing of the play maintains an unclear prose/verse lineation? Does the printer Edward Allde provide us with the “authoritative” version of how the text should be read? Does the Digital Anthology of Early Modern English Drama? How does editing or printing a text also require some form of interpretation? Your response should be one to two pages.
b. Short project: Select thirty lines from Massacre and create a critical edition of the excerpt. Your notes should include how your edition maintains and diverges from the documentary edition and how your editorial decisions affect readings of the scene.
Day One: Prose and Verse
a. Some possible answers could include: class differences, different language uses
Day Two: Re-lineation
Day Three: Early modern printing