



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Insights into organizational culture through Robert Heller's Masterclasses based on Charles Handy's theories. Learn to identify the dominant culture in your organization (Zeus, Apollo, or Athena) and find the right balance to maximize effectiveness. Discover the strengths and weaknesses of each culture and how to counteract their excesses.
What you will learn
Typology: Summaries
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Masterclasses
Organizing the Culture The culture of an organization — the way it works and what I people believe about it — has a major effect on performance and overall results. Identify the dominant culture of your organization, using the Handy-based questionnaires set out in this masterclass. Then seek to balance the cultural mix to obtain maximum effectiveness from everyone. UNDERSTANDING THE CULTURES Handy identified four cultural patterns, each characterized by a different Greek god. Most organizations are dominated by one of the three cultural patterns below. The fourth culture, ruled by Dionysus, is that of the individual, and its followers are not interested in organization or in organized cultures. THE THREE TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 1 Power - ruled by Zeus 2 Role - ruled by Apollo 3 Task - ruled by Athena Each Handy culture has its particular strengths. The personal power of Zeus-dominance can work wonderfully well even in large companies — given the right father figure. But larger companies also require the order and control that Apollo’s role culture embodies, with its emphasis on systems, routines, and predictability. In today’s fast-moving environment both Zeus and Apollo find the Athenian task-orientated approach increasingly essential. FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE Achieving the right balance between Handy’s gods involves countering the excesses that all three cultures can easily develop — respectively, autocracy, bureaucracy, and disintegration. A successful mix will also embrace individualistic Dionysus. The combination of all four gods satisfies Handy’s definition of good management. For this you must use Zeus to provide purpose and direction, Apollo to look after the steady-state needs, Athena to keep the organization moving forward, and Dionysus to supply the vital spark of creativity.
COUNTERING THE EXCESSES The potential excesses of an Apollonian role culture are dehumanized behaviours and the creation of a power lid bureaucracy. Countering these excesses requires finding ways of injecting individualism into what is essentially a collective culture. One way of forcing a general cultural change is to alter the reward system. Apollonians love rigid pay-scales tied to rigid hierarchies, under peculiar rules, such as “nobody can be promoted more than two grades at a time” or “lower grades cannot be placed over higher grades”. Do not reward people simply for coming to work. Give exceptional rewards for exceptional performance, and make the rewards psychic (celebrations, congratulations, etc.) as well as real (money and promotion). CHANGING SPECIFIC BEHAVIOURS You can change the culture of an organization only by changing the behaviour of individual members. There are eight specific Apollonian behaviours that together lead to a dehumanized and bureaucratic organization. Each one has an antidote, which, if routinely employed, will decrease these unhelpful tendencies. WAYS TO CHANGE APOLLONIAN BEHAVIOURS 1 Refusing to entertain contradictory/unorthodox views. Empower official Cassandras to oppose the consensus. 2 Ignoring evidence that argues against chosen policies. Require proposers to provide a full list of pros and cons. 3 Taking decisions that are unethical or inhumane. Publish a code of ethics and appoint an ombudsman. 4 Seeing opponents and colleagues as stereotypes rather than individuals. Arrange face-to-face meetings supervised by an impartial facilitator. 5 Pressurizing people to conform to group opinions. Reward individual initiatives and demand new ideas. 6 Forming cliques that keep themselves to themselves. Send outsiders into groups as co-opted members. 7 Leaving people in groups no option but unanimity. Solicit everybody’s opinion in rotation. 8 Continuing with policies that have been proved false.