Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY In this chapter ..., Exams of Research Methodology

Considering the features of qualitative research design, the data gathered from the study will be. Page 2. 24 presented in form of descriptive analysis. Besides ...

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/01/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 🇵🇭

4.4

(652)

10K documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
23
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the researcher presents research design, research setting,
research subjects, data collection, data collection procedures, and data analysis as
follows.
3.1 Research Design
Research design is the procedural data collection and interpretation chosen
by the researcher to conduct the research. Creswell (2012, p.293) argues that
research design is a pattern that followed by the researcher for collecting,
analyzing, and interpreting the data. In selecting research design, the researcher
should consider what and how the data should be gathered and analyzed. There
are three conventional research designs namely qualitative, quantitative and mixed
research design (qualitative & quantitative).
In conducting the study, the researcher applied qualitative research design.
Ary et al. (2010, p. 29) define qualitative research design as the holistic
understanding of a certain event or natural social setting. Moreover, they believe
that qualitative research design presents description about situational setting and
participants’ activities in form of sentences rather than numerical data (Ary et al.,
2010, p. 424). This study aimed to gain knowledge and information about TBLT
implementation in Listening IV A class. Furthermore, the researcher also
investigated the strengths and the weaknesses of the implementation. Considering
the features of qualitative research design, the data gathered from the study will be
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY In this chapter ... and more Exams Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

In this chapter, the researcher presents research design, research setting, research subjects, data collection, data collection procedures, and data analysis as follows. 3.1 Research Design

Research design is the procedural data collection and interpretation chosen by the researcher to conduct the research. Creswell (2012, p.293) argues that research design is a pattern that followed by the researcher for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data. In selecting research design, the researcher should consider what and how the data should be gathered and analyzed. There are three conventional research designs namely qualitative, quantitative and mixed research design (qualitative & quantitative).

In conducting the study, the researcher applied qualitative research design. Ary et al. (2010, p. 29) define qualitative research design as the holistic understanding of a certain event or natural social setting. Moreover, they believe that qualitative research design presents description about situational setting and participants’ activities in form of sentences rather than numerical data (Ary et al., 2010, p. 424). This study aimed to gain knowledge and information about TBLT implementation in Listening IV A class. Furthermore, the researcher also investigated the strengths and the weaknesses of the implementation. Considering the features of qualitative research design, the data gathered from the study will be

presented in form of descriptive analysis. Besides, it referred to the sequences and related theories of TBLT.

3.2 Research Setting

The study was conducted in University of Muhammadiyah Malang which is located in Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246, Malang. University of Muhammadiyah Malang was selected as the research setting by considering the quality of education related to English teaching and learning. The current place of teaching and learning process of TBLT was conducted at Listening IV A class. It is located in the language laboratory of University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

3.3 Research Subject

In this study, the researcher focused on the implementation of TBLT done by the lecturer of Listening IV A class for the fourth semester students of English Language Education Department of University of Muhammadiyah Malang. He is the only lecturer who uses TBLT for teaching listening. He believes that TBLT is the best way to teach such language skill. Moreover, he argues that learning by practicing is useful for EFL learners in language learning.

The students of Listening IV A class for the fourth semester students of English Language Education Department of University of Muhammadiyah Malang was chosen based on the requirement of the research subjects. In this class, the lecturer applied TBLT for teaching learning process. Moreover, Listening IV A class students’ listening ability was feasible for TBLT implementation. Considering the urgency and settlement of the subjects of the study, this research would be conducted in Listening IV A class.

During the observation, the researcher attempted to record the situation of TBLT implementation in the teaching learning process. There were two instruments used by the researcher to record the implementation of TBLT in Listening IV A class which were field notes and video recording. The field notes of the observations would be presented in Appendix I.

  1. Document In the qualitative research, document can be used as a source of data analysis. According to Creswell (2012, p.223), document is “a valuable source of information in qualitative research”. Furthermore, Ary et al. (2010) divide document into two categories which are written and non-written documents. In this study, the researcher obtained the data in form of written document that collected from the students’ paper works to analyze the focus on form sequence of TBLT implementation. Focus on form sequence of TBLT required the students to practice grammatical focus exercises in various kinds of task. Moreover, focus on form sequence of TBLT indicated the students’ understanding of previous activities that gave them input gradually. Thus, the researcher collected the students’ paper works as a written document to investigate what kind of task used by the lecturer in the focus on form activity. Furthermore, she also investigated how the students used the input from previous task sequences in the focus on form sequence.
  2. Interview For gathering a further understanding of TBLT implementation in Listening IV A class, the researcher conducted interview with the lecturer. Interview contains about the description of individual assumption about current

circumstance (Ary et al., 2010, p.438). Furthermore, Creswell (2012) argues that interview gives more opportunities for the researcher to gain detail information that cannot be collected from the observation.

Interview is divided into three categories, which are, structured interview, unstructured interview, and semi-structured interview (Wahyuni, 2012). In this study, the researcher used semi-structured interview to get a further understanding of TBLT implementation and verify the data gathered from the observation. Therefore, the researcher used semi-stuctured interview that provides “more than just answer, but reason for the answer” (Wahyuni, 2012, p. 55). The interview guide would be presented in Appendix II. In addition, the researcher also attempted to record the interview in form of audio recording.

In addition, the researcher also collected the data from the students’ responds due to enrich information about TBLT implementation. The researcher used open-ended questionnaire as the research instrument. Creswell (2012) believes that open-ended questionnaire provides broader information under study. There were seven fill-in questions in English about TBLT implementation that prepared by the researcher for the students. According to Ary et al. (2010, p. 392) “completion or fill-in items are open-ended questions to which respondents must supply their own answers in their words”. In this case, the researcher attempted to identify if the implementation of TBLT was useful for the students. The questionnaire would be presented in Appendix III.

used written document or students’ paper works for further investigation of the current sequence of TBLT implementation.

  1. Distributing Questionnaire In addition, the researcher distributed an open-ended questionnaire to the students. It contained seven open-ended questions in English related to teaching learning process in Listening IV A class. The students answered the questions in description form based on their background knowledge and opinion. After that, the researcher collected the papers and analyzed the documents.
  2. Interview After the observation, the researcher conducted an interview with the lecturer. The interview aimed to increase understanding of TBLT implementation and to verify data gathered from the observation. There were a number of questions prepared by the researcher which focused on TBLT implementation. During the interview, the researcher attempted to record the interview process in form of notes and audio recording. 3. 5 Data Analysis

Data analysis is a crucial part of writing the thesis. It is believed that "analysis is the act of giving meaning to data" (Corbin and Strauss, as cited in Ary et al., 2010, p. 480). There are several complex phases that are required in qualitative data analysis. According to Ary et al. (2010, p. 481), qualitative data analysis “involves reducing and organizing the data, synthesizing, searching for significant patterns, and discovering what is important”. In this study, the researcher analyzed the data gathered from observation, interview, and

documents. Furthermore, it is important to order and classify the data to answer each research question and also withdraw the conclusion.

Qualitative data analysis contains a large amount of data. Therefore, the researcher should determine effective analysis pattern. Ary et al. (2010) suggest three simple phases for qualitative data analysis which are, (1) familiarizing and organizing, (2) coding and reducing, and (3) interpreting and representing. Considering three logical steps of qualitative data analysis, the researcher conducted these steps of qualitative data analysis procedure along with the conclusion to analyze the data. There were some sections as follows:

  1. Familiarizing and Organizing In the first step of data analysis phase, the researcher attempted to reread and reviewed all the data in order to increase understanding. The data were gathered from observation, field notes, videotape recorder, students' paperwork, interview videotapes, notes, and questionnaire. After grasped and ensured related information under study, the researcher organized the data in written list. This phase aimed to make an easier analysis with a large amount of data.
  2. Coding and Reducing The second step contained “the identification of categories and themes and their refinement” (Ary et al., 2010, p. 483). In this case, the researcher labeled or coded the data based on certain criteria, such as priming, preparation, target task, report, and focus on form , classroom management, and so on. It is aimed to divide certain information needed by the researcher. In the next step, the researcher reduced the criteria into more specific area which were, initial activity, TBLT sequences, closing activity, strengths, and weaknesses.