Download Legal Dispute over Inheritance: Samson Family Case and more Summaries Law of Evidence in PDF only on Docsity!
PMHKOO400050820L7 3
trT{TO (^) E
ften
qrqriE-rra-osfl
e.
on. qH* 'qi+^ qrqrm{rd
G-c'Ef
qTqT*$-f
v ufr.nq-.qrqr'..,fi{r
{qrordi, 6'remid, +'it-"rgt.
eft-orqr qflquM^ ftfeqd Aj+@i frsr s-rr-rq-rfi,in it&ff
(erdaT (^) ui, frqq qu)
ft'qfrd ffi eT+m/zolzorg
qrfr,fr
$fir{ owuffiq A. oqt (^) ffi rft (^) so'q ffi a.Fgfi $rq-{ oaryffih ea:t
EEur+i
gtuaarR,r 1@-rr@ 4als/*o4{
qM qrqrd?ni
nJzlrzqe}
q,f{f,'ffi.{r
Fptqr
qr enterrfusa<
oTftm
qfr,
ffioq-a@:P*
q-{ri+d
fr, +iq6 H, gdf (^) ffifr-{, gm €qrq gt
. qT qT-amd-d an gg'r-rlva{ia e.fk (^) $rft=ft S:q.sq o€qiuifrh qi.}^ <lce trH^ 3rw^ ziT
qrqldqTqd
iqrf; (^) rffi mwqt-iT Gil-d] 3rri srftr q'3rftf,ral^ gqlqniffi qr^ qqraqli difts (^) m
Iruor0n ftffi Hqn( trdor GG,
qrfi
grel (^) ccn qrfr.
gq-aT q-fr-i g,Et (^) 1s6: +fia ftF-qr qr^ orft.n-qgt gqarrql-e
+tq oquilr+r& oTq-ilrdTf m.f*f,f,
ffi erqfi^ Cufr q& rw
q (IF"qlr{
graT 3]:ltrQirilo (^) GTfffi gfllrft ds'q.qrqT fuq tuqr-o
d-ic
swf
L"/-
rf n
r-Li
Ctre'sc,r,)
efr
l
l!,
-h,/, ,l
'=i
I\ TFIE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE_I\IIf.
IJ,Q}JAIKABNJI
AI
ICHALKAiT\J I
I) Smt. Shalini Samson
Kall,ansing Age - 60. Occu - (^) HoLrseho$l
R/o - C.l.G.l. 2 t/C,
Chaitanya
Nagar l(olagili Roacl, Dharu,ad
I{arnatalizr Sou. (^) SopJria Rajerrdra Balaxre
Age - 33, Occr-i - l-lousehold
Vo- Dhanvacl;
Tal -^ Dhan$acl Dis-t - I)haniad (^) *-; , Soi-r. Savita (^) Lai.vrence Honrbel
Ag* -^ 30, Oceu - Flor-rselrolcl
R/o- Dharwad,
'fal
Dist - Dl'ranvad
.,S
Kasruri (^) Singanhalli
Alleging herself as a
Smt. Kasturi Samson (^) Kalyansing Age -^ 55, Occur - (^) HoLrseholrl R/o - Il"ukacJi, (^) Tril - Hatkandliigle
Dist - l(olhapur
Sou. Radha (^) Yamtroor Shiganhassi Age - 30. Occu - Househr_rld R/o - Gandhinag;-rr (^) Sertleurqrnt
Area, Huballi, Karnataka
(livilAppeal No.
ffi- (^) '
O
Appellants (Ori, 0pponcnrs in M,A, No 4i l2t Responclents (Ori. (^) Appliu'ants in (^) M.A. No, 4r'12)
i)
a.il{
v
sf4"dq
E
fr
J'he leanrecj
lorver
coulr.s .fudgrnetrr and orcjer ar.e unreasonairle
'I'he
lower colrrt
(^) has nor and (^) pr.ured that (^) rrppeilant rro. (^) I Snr:is,;r: Ku lr 3n5j6g.
r\ ation
abr:ut
the clir.ecriorr
in all tc(J. ed (^) thcr
fiict tlrat,
lt.s ls csLablishcrd witb o1'clecrrasecl .r lr.grilly
wer:cled aritgtlc (^) cviclencc
tln rr.cor.cl
rr'ct)t'tl (^) rr rtltr:1j..
htild titlt
at The lou.er r-oul-t inspite
of suttlcienr
antJ
abour rn.
marriage a.rrd (^) legitmi-r
ol app_,llant
.rn respondent no. (^) I
is u,il-e of
late (^) Samson.
- (^) The
lower
court
has presLrires in legitimacy. ti)
'fhe jowel
court erught
onJy (^) Jegally weedecl willb ancl claLrghters
of late Sarnson.
_
not considerecl
the
\
leg:rl positiorr
thaL. law to have
hold rhat
the appellalu (^) no. t.he (^) aplti:llant
no...l
is thc 2 anr.l .J are thc only
legal ') )
'l'h.-
Ion,er (^) cour.t
enquir.t, was
necessary lesponclent no, (^) I ancl 2
has not
considerc.d
thc Iirut
rrrrl
as the case
o1.<.livor.ce h:rs (^) llcrrn
ilru. tltltt
t)o (^) rilt.y
put li)l1lr
iry thc
*, t r I .l) (^) fhe lower courl (^) ought to (^) havc, cleclirrecl thc of (^) late
Sumson
l(alyasingh
and shoulcl
have certitlcale
in fiivour of
appellants. Ilr (^) The
ro*er
court (^) ha-s not (^) appric'd its (^) rnincr
to rhe scopc'i'scc.
sLlcl-essiun -172^ 0f act (^) antj naturie oienquil_t. bcinw (^) ,it. l3) The (^) roiver court has (^) not consiciered that,
as appera'l
,n. (^) r is rcgaili weeded wit'e (^) of ]ate (^) sa,rson, respo,rlenr n,r. (^) l cioes (^) not accluire (^) trre sr'tus ra,i (^) I'e o' ol' I utc- (^) Snr rrsor r. iiltpellant as a lcgal heirs
grlrrrlctl
tirt: sLtcuessi()r)
not secn
that (^) corrclirel, c:o (^) 11;1[iliitiorr ciocs no [hr.. (^) resltrtflClent tr0. l.
- (^) The lou,er courr (^) has c:loth (^) the
srarus of ri.ifb
r.r,ith
' t-
,|
"fhe
lower colrrt
inspire oi con
I(asturi lvas voicl,
(^) dLle
to effect
oi Chrl
tlrat l(asturi
was also u,ile
of Salnson
the (^) detelrnination of' share.
ing that,
allegecl marliage
ol
n Marriage
Act, wror-iul1.
helrl
errccl in giving
direction about.
notlring br"rt tire
ol'there (^) legal
i6)
'fhe
iorrcr c-oi.Jn
order irr :erc;s
..ri tlirection
is
tbrecing
the appellant in (^) unrvanted
litrgation. irrspire
r'-iationship (^) ri irh (^) l.rre Sarnson.
l8)
'fhe
iorver (^) coLu.r,s finding (^) and
of I{asturri it self
is wrong (^) and illegal
and wrong.
l9t (^) Thc lorn,er. (^) coLll.r s .clirc,crions
r','Ilriurrshiit
oj'I(asiuri and I{aclha
(^) on
"
r Thc^ l.*'er (^) coun
has not
considcred (^) thc-
tirct rhar
decea-sctr (^) rr.'s
t'lrisrirur
ar the time orhis
delth,
anct ody rndian
successio, Acr
rviil be
applicable (^) while deciding the succession.i
observatiolt (^) [rs t() the allr,getl rrrln.ilgr:
henee (^) din-ction aiso (^) becomes a illegal
:
is also norhing
bur lirsring
an illegal
the fulr;ellant.
2q '1'liouglr
rhe fincJing
as (^) to the rei"i{ionsJrip
ol. appeilant
witrr
rare
sarnson is proper
ancr correct
but the rincli,g
as to the (^) responcrert is
i ncorect ancl
il logical.
2l
)
'l'he
lorver coLrrt's
misu,derstancli,g
as to (^) trre
rarv uncl lirr:t
lras :'csulrecl in sr.rch (^) illegal and rvrong direction.
llt (^) I'he lorver
coun has
not (^) consi,Cer.erl
the lbct
that, it has [o
-grant (^) the
sr-rccession (^) as
they have proved
the primiL facie titr.,
(^) as c',ternplate<r by la', (^) it shourd not have (^) issued the (^) wrong
arcr i,egar crirectio,.
- The (^) lowel court's (^) observatiotr as to (^) appeJ,lant
shalini nor enritlecl
(^) tbr.
ccrtit'jc:irte is w,r-oug (^) and illu,gal.
