Download Basic Approaches to Leadership-Organizational Behaviour-Lecture Slides and more Slides Organization Behaviour in PDF only on Docsity!
Bob Stretch Southwestern College
Robbins & Judge
Organizational Behavior
13th Edition
Basic Approaches to Leadership
Docsity.com^ 12-
Chapter Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
- Define leadership and contrast leadership and management.
- Summarize the conclusions of trait theories.
- Identify the central tenets and main limitations of behavioral theories.
- Assess contingency theories of leadership by their level of support.
- Contrast the interactive theories (path-goal and leader-member exchange).
- Identify the situational variables in the leader-participation model.
- Show how U.S. managers might need to adjust their leadership approaches in Brazil, France, Egypt, and China.
Docsity.com^ 12-
Trait Theories of Leadership
Theories that consider personality, social, physical, or
intellectual traits to differentiate leaders from
nonleaders
Not very useful until matched with the Big Five
Personality Framework
Leadership Traits
- Extroversion
- Conscientiousness
- Openness
- Emotional Intelligence (Qualified)
Traits can predict leadership, but they are better at
predicting leader emergence than effectiveness.
Docsity.com^ 12-
Behavioral Theories of Leadership
Theories proposing that specific behaviors differentiate
leaders from nonleaders
Differences between theories of leadership:
- Trait theory: leadership is inherent, so we must identify the leader based on his or her traits
- Behavioral theory: leadership is a skill set and can be taught to anyone, so we must identify the proper behaviors to teach potential leaders
Docsity.com^ 12-
Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid®
Draws on both studies to
assess leadership style
- “Concern for People” is Consideration and Employee-Orientation
- “Concern for Production” is Initiating Structure and Production-Orientation
Style is determined by
position on the graph
12-
E X H I B I T 12-
Docsity.com
Contingency Theories
While trait and behavior theories do help us
understand leadership, an important component is
missing: the environment in which the leader exists
Contingency Theory deals with this additional aspect of
leadership effectiveness studies
Three key theories:
- Fielder’s Model
- Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory
- Path-Goal Theory
Docsity.com^ 12-
Graphic Representation of Fiedler’s Model
12-
E X H I B I T 12-
Used to determine which type of leader to use in a given situation
Docsity.com
Assessment of Fiedler’s Model
Positives:
- Considerable evidence supports the model, especially if the original eight situations are grouped into three
12-
Problems:
- The logic behind the LPC scale is not well understood
- LPC scores are not stable
- Contingency variables are complex and hard to determine
Docsity.com
Hersey & Blanchard’s Situational Leadership
A model that focuses on follower “readiness”
- Followers can accept or reject the leader
- Effectiveness depends on the followers’ response to the leader’s actions
- “Readiness” is the extent to which people have the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task
A paternal model:
- As the child matures, the adult releases more and more control over the situation
- As the workers become more ready, the leader becomes more laissez-faire
An intuitive model that does not get much support
from the research findings
Docsity.com^ 12-
House’s Path-Goal Theory
Builds from the Ohio State studies and the expectancy
theory of motivation
The Theory:
- Leaders provide followers with information, support, and resources to help them achieve their goals
- Leaders help clarify the “path” to the worker’s goals
- Leaders can display multiple leadership types
Four types of leaders:
- Directive: focuses on the work to be done
- Supportive: focuses on the well-being of the worker
- Participative: consults with employees in decision-making
- Achievement-Oriented: sets challenging goals
Docsity.com^ 12-
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
A response to the failing of contingency theories to
account for followers and heterogeneous leadership
approaches to individual workers
LMX Premise:
- Because of time pressures, leaders form a special relationship with a small group of followers: the “in-group”
- This in-group is trusted and gets more time and attention from the leader (more “exchanges”)
- All other followers are in the “out-group” and get less of the leader’s attention and tend to have formal relationships with the leader (fewer “exchanges”)
- Leaders pick group members early in the relationship
Docsity.com^ 12-
LMX Model
How groups are assigned is unclear
- Follower characteristics determine group membership
Leaders control by keeping favorites close
Research has been generally supportive
12-
E X H I B I T 12-
Docsity.com
Global Implications
These leadership theories are primarily studied in
English-speaking countries
GLOBE does have some country-specific insights
- Brazilian teams prefer leaders who are high in consideration, participative, and have high LPC scores
- French workers want a leader who is high on initiating structure and task-oriented
- Egyptian employees value team-oriented, participative leadership, while keeping a high-power distance
- Chinese workers may favor a moderately participative style
Leaders should take culture into account
Docsity.com^ 12-
Summary and Managerial Implications
Leadership is central to understanding group behavior
as the leader provides the direction
Extroversion, conscientiousness, and openness all show
consistent relationships to leadership
Behavioral approaches have narrowed leadership down
into two usable dimensions
Need to take into account the situational variables,
especially the impact of followers
Docsity.com^ 12-