


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Axiology Nature and types of axiology
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Axiology is the philosophical study of value. It is either the collective term for ethics and aesthetics- philosophical fields that depend crucially on notions of value or the foundation for these fields, and thus similar to value theory and meta-ehics. The term was first used by Paul Lapie in 1902 and Edward Von Hartman in 1908.
Axiology is the science of value. The word ‘axiology’ derived from two Greek words- ‘axios’ means worth or value and ‘logos’ means logic or theory, means theory of value. The development of the science makes possible the objective measurement of value as accurately as a thermometer measures heat.
Axiology is an objective format for measuring intangible attitudes and values. Moreover, axiology measures the level of development and the types of one’s perceptual biases in one’s thinking.
Axiology studies mainly two kinds of values: ethics and aesthetics. Ethics investigates the concepts of right and good in individual and social conduct. Aesthetics studies the concept of beauty and harmony.
Ethics also known as moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. Ethics is a complement to aesthetics in the philosophical field of axiology. In philosophy, ethics studies the moral behaviour in humans and how one should act.
Ethics may be broadly defined as that division of philosophy which deals with questions concerning the nature of value in matters of human conduct.
While virtually all people are concerned with making ehical judgements and decisions, philosophers in particular are concerned to
Explicate the nature of such judgements in general and
Provide criteria for determining what is ethically right or wrong, and Analyze the reasons we have for holding them to be correct.
Those concerned exclusively with telling us what is right or wrong, good or bad, in matters of human conduct may be termed “moralists”. While philosophers have sometimes been moralists, as philosophers their primary concern is not so much to provide moral perscriptions as it is to explain why what we consider to be ‘right’ or ‘good’ is right or good. To do so, philosophers engaged with such questions have generally sought to formulate and justify “ethical theories” which are intended to explain the fundamental nature of that which is ‘good’, why it is ‘good’, and why the ethical priniciples which are most commonly used to evaluate human conduct follow from this theory of that which is good.
There are two types of ethical theories-
wrong are the consequences of the action; quite simply a “right action” is one which has good consequences and a “wrong action” has bad consequences.
theory that it is not the consequences but the motivation which prompts the agent to do an action which makes an action right or wrong. On this type of ehtical theory an action motivated by the right sort of reasons will be “right” no matter whether its consequences are desirable or not, whereas an action motivated by the wrong sorts of reasons will be a wrong action, even if its consequences might be considered desirable.
Ethics maybe divided into four major areas of study:
and how their truth values may be determined.
action.
Value is the quality in the object that satisfies the desire of the subject. Desires can be divided into Sungsang desire and Hyungsang desire; as a consequence, there are also Sungsang value and Hyungsang value. Sungsang value is a spiritual value that satisfies the sungsang desire; it consists of trueness, goodness, beauty and love. Trueness, beauty and goodness are the values corresponding to the three faculties of the mind, namely, intellect, emotion and will.
On the other hand, Hyungsang value which satisfies the Hyungsang desire, refers to the value of daily necessities, such as food, clothing and shelter- called material value or commodity value. Material value is the value necessary for physical life or the value that satisfies the desire of the physical mind. Physical life is the basis for file growth of the spirit person and for the fulfilment of the three great blessings. Thus, the Hyungsang value is a requisite for the realisation of sungsang value.
In this way value includes both Sungsang value and Hyungsang value. Axiology, however, is a philosophical field that deals primarily with sungsang value.
Siddiqui M.H., Philosophical and Sociological Foundations of Education, A P H Publishing Corporation, New Delhi. Fernandes M.M., The Foundations of Education: The Philosophical Approach, Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi. Das B.N., Foundations of Education, Nil Kamal Publishing House, New Delhi.