



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A detailed analysis of article 15 of the indian constitution, which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It covers the key clauses of article 15, including the exceptions and interpretations by the supreme court. The scope and application of article 15, highlighting landmark judgments that have shaped its interpretation. It explores the concept of discrimination, the distinction between legislative differentiation and discrimination, and the state's obligations to prevent violations of fundamental rights by private individuals. The document also delves into the special provisions for women and children under article 15(3), and the court's expansive interpretation of this clause. Overall, this comprehensive analysis offers valuable insights into the constitutional safeguards against discrimination in india.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Beaten by Teacher For Touching Water Pot, Dalit Boy Dies of Injuries in Raj's Jalore; Internet Cut in Area,
Clause (1) to Clause (6) Clause (4) of Art. 15- added by 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951- Socially and Educational Backward Classes Art. 15 (5)- Added by 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2005 Art. 15 (6)- Added by 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2018 Article 15- Prohibition on Discrimination Article (1)- Restriction on State- It prohibits State from discrimination of any citizen on grounds of; Religion Race Caste Sex Place of Birth Or any of the above However, legislative differentiation are not discriminatory.
Charu Khurana v. UOI, AIR 2015 SC 839 The bye-laws framed by the Cine Costume, Make-up Artists and Hair dressers Association, under section 21-A of the Trade Union Act, 1926 restricted the membership of the association only to men. Striking down the Bye-Laws as offending the constitutional mandate against sex discrimination, the Apex court referred to the Directive Principles of State Policy as also the Fundamental Duties contained in Part IV and Part IVA, respectively. While the former provides for a guidance to interpretation of fundamental rights, latter say of the collective duty of the state. Devika Biswas v. UOI, AIR 2016 SC 4405 The Apex Court ruled that the policies and incentives schemes, in promotion of their family planning programme, were to made gender neutral and that the unnecessary focus on female sterilization be discontinued. It has been observed that a society that does not respect its women cannot be treated to be civilized.
The object behind Clause (2) of Article 15 is to guard against the menace of discrimination which can possibly be practice, in a country like India, on a vast scale and relentless manner. People Union of Democratic Rights v. UOI, AIR 1982 SC 1473