Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Answers to Exercise 10 Life Tables, Survivorship Curves, and ..., Slides of Evolutionary biology

A type I curve tells us that most individuals in this population survive a long time and die at old ages. The graph of gx supports this interpretation: survival ...

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

uzmaan
uzmaan 🇺🇸

3.1

(9)

216 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Answers: Exercise 10 Page 1 of 4
Answers to Exercise 10
Life Tables, Survivorship Curves, and Population Growth
1. We plot survivorship curves on semi-log graphs because lx is a proportion: the
proportion of the original cohort surviving to age x. The distance between points on a
logarithmic axis reflects their proportional relationship, and so a logarithmic scale is
appropriate.
This kind of graph also makes clear important differences between the three types of
survivorship curve. Note that on the linear graph, type II and type III curves have
qualitatively similar shapes, whereas on the semi-log graph they look quite different.
2. The keys to interpreting the shapes of survivorship curves are to look at their slopes
compared with the graphs of age-specific survival (gx). The type I curve begins with a
shallow slope, indicating low mortality among the young—that is, a high proportion
of individuals of each age survive to the next age throughout the early part of life. The
curve steepens at older ages, indicating increased mortality in old age. A type I curve
tells us that most individuals in this population survive a long time and die at old ages.
The graph of gx supports this interpretation: survival is high in the young, and drops
off with age. Inspect columns E and H to see these patterns numerically.
The type III curve reflects the opposite pattern of survival and mortality. The curve
begins with a steep slope, indicating low survival (and high mortality) among the
young. The shallow slope in middle and old ages indicates that most of the individuals
that survive their youth survive to old age. The graph of gx shows the same
thing—survival among the young is very low, and increases with age (until the oldest
age). Inspect columns F and I to see these patterns numerically.
The type II curve indicates a constant rate of survival across all ages (until the last).
Note that a straight line on a semi-log plot indicates change by a constant proportion.
The graph of gx (a horizontal line) also shows that survival is the same for all ages
(except the oldest). Inspect columns G and J to see these patterns numerically.
3. The type I curve of life expectancy is probably not surprising, as it shows that the
expected number of years of life remaining decreases with increasing age.
The type II curve may strike you as somewhat surprising. It indicates that an
individual can expect to live about 2 more years, regardless of age, up to about 6 years
of age. After this, life expectancy decreases, to 1 year at 10 years of age. How can this
be? A type II survivorship curve occurs when the same proportion of survivors die at
each age (in other words, when the risk of death is constant for all ages). In this
circumstance, life expectancy is the reciprocal of risk of death. If you look at the
spreadsheet, you will see that half of the survivors die at each age. The reciprocal of _
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Answers to Exercise 10 Life Tables, Survivorship Curves, and ... and more Slides Evolutionary biology in PDF only on Docsity!

Answers to Exercise 10

Life Tables, Survivorship Curves, and Population Growth

  1. We plot survivorship curves on semi-log graphs because lx is a proportion : the proportion of the original cohort surviving to age x. The distance between points on a logarithmic axis reflects their proportional relationship, and so a logarithmic scale is appropriate. This kind of graph also makes clear important differences between the three types of survivorship curve. Note that on the linear graph, type II and type III curves have qualitatively similar shapes, whereas on the semi-log graph they look quite different.
  2. The keys to interpreting the shapes of survivorship curves are to look at their slopes compared with the graphs of age-specific survival ( gx ). The type I curve begins with a shallow slope, indicating low mortality among the young—that is, a high proportion of individuals of each age survive to the next age throughout the early part of life. The curve steepens at older ages, indicating increased mortality in old age. A type I curve tells us that most individuals in this population survive a long time and die at old ages. The graph of gx supports this interpretation: survival is high in the young, and drops off with age. Inspect columns E and H to see these patterns numerically. The type III curve reflects the opposite pattern of survival and mortality. The curve begins with a steep slope, indicating low survival (and high mortality) among the young. The shallow slope in middle and old ages indicates that most of the individuals that survive their youth survive to old age. The graph of gx shows the same thing—survival among the young is very low, and increases with age (until the oldest age). Inspect columns F and I to see these patterns numerically. The type II curve indicates a constant rate of survival across all ages (until the last). Note that a straight line on a semi-log plot indicates change by a constant proportion. The graph of gx (a horizontal line) also shows that survival is the same for all ages (except the oldest). Inspect columns G and J to see these patterns numerically.
  3. The type I curve of life expectancy is probably not surprising, as it shows that the expected number of years of life remaining decreases with increasing age. The type II curve may strike you as somewhat surprising. It indicates that an individual can expect to live about 2 more years, regardless of age, up to about 6 years of age. After this, life expectancy decreases, to 1 year at 10 years of age. How can this be? A type II survivorship curve occurs when the same proportion of survivors die at each age (in other words, when the risk of death is constant for all ages). In this circumstance, life expectancy is the reciprocal of risk of death. If you look at the spreadsheet, you will see that half of the survivors die at each age. The reciprocal of _

is 2—the life expectancy.

If you spread reproduction out over a longer time span by changing b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , and b 4 to 1.0 and leaving b 0 at 0.0, you will see that the resulting values of R 0 and r are slightly larger than the original scenario (with b 2 = 4.0). However, the increase is much smaller than the increase that occurred when you shifted reproduction entirely to age

  1. The reason is that some reproduction occurs earlier, which increases R 0 and r. However, much of the reproduction occurs later, decreasing R 0 and r. The net result is a slight increase. The values given here are only examples; you can experiment with other numbers. Another interesting thing to try is to figure out how many offspring an individual must produce to keep the population stable under various fertility schedules. This number of offspring is called replacement fertility —another statistic you may have heard. It is often said that the replacement fertility for human females is about 2.1. You may ask yourself, how does that depend on the ages at which women bear children and the number they bear at each age?
  2. Try changing the Sx values given to those given in the table below, observing the effects on R 0 and r.

Table 1. Hypothetical survivorship schedules for investigating the effect of survivorship on population growth

Age ( x ) Sx Age ( x ) Sx 0 1000 0 1000 1 500 1 250 2 250 2 125 3 125 3 100 4 0 4 0

Notice that the first set of Sx values in the table gives a type II survivorship curve, and the second set gives a type III curve. If you now try the various fertility schedules described in the answer to Question 1, you will see somewhat different effects, depending on the survivorship schedule. Shifting reproduction earlier produces the greatest increase in R 0 and r in the type III survivorship schedule. This occurs because type III survivorship has the highest mortality in young ages, and so reproducing earlier means there are many more survivors to reproduce. Shifting reproduction later decreases R 0 and r to in all three types of survivorship schedules, but most noticeably in type II. In the type I schedule, there is little mortality in middle ages, so delaying reproduction has little effect unless it is delayed

to the very end of the life-span. In the type III schedule, most of the mortality has already