Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Anova and regression, Exercises of Business Statistics

Anova and regression techniques questions for practice and the estimation of regression techniques

Typology: Exercises

2022/2023

Uploaded on 11/27/2023

vaibhav-pratap-singh
vaibhav-pratap-singh 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
a. The estimated regression equation can be written as:
\[y = 653.469 - 53.523(X_1) - 11.028(X_2)\]
Where:
- \(y\) represents the estimated demand for housing.
- \(X_1\) represents the current interest rate (%).
- \(X_2\) represents the rate of unemployment (%).
b. Interpretation of the coefficient values:
- The intercept (653.469): This is the estimated demand for housing when both the interest rate
and unemployment rate are zero. However, in the context of this problem, it may not have a
practical interpretation since interest rates and unemployment rates are unlikely to be zero in
the real world.
- Interest Rate Coefficient (-53.523): This coefficient suggests that for each one-unit increase in
the current interest rate (measured in percentage points), the estimated demand for housing
decreases by approximately 53.523 units, all else being equal. In other words, higher interest
rates are associated with lower demand for housing.
- Unemployment Rate Coefficient (-11.028): This coefficient suggests that for each one-unit
increase in the rate of unemployment (measured in percentage points), the estimated demand
for housing decreases by approximately 11.028 units, all else being equal. This indicates that
higher unemployment rates are associated with lower demand for housing.
c. Comment on the overall strength of the model from the ANOVA table:
The ANOVA table provides information about the overall strength of the model. In this case:
- The Multiple R (correlation coefficient) is 0.923, which is close to 1. This suggests a strong
positive linear relationship between the independent variables (interest rate and
unemployment rate) and the dependent variable (demand for housing).
- The R-squared (R^2) value is 0.852, indicating that approximately 85.2% of the variation in the
demand for housing can be explained by the linear regression model using interest rate and
unemployment rate as predictors. This is a relatively high R-squared value, indicating that the
model does a good job of explaining the variation in housing demand.
- The Adjusted R-squared is 0.754, which is still relatively high and suggests that the model is a
good fit for the data.
d. Comment about the significance of the regression coefficients:
Looking at the significance of the coefficients:
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Anova and regression and more Exercises Business Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

a. The estimated regression equation can be written as: [y = 653.469 - 53.523(X_1) - 11.028(X_2)] Where:

  • (y) represents the estimated demand for housing.
  • (X_1) represents the current interest rate (%).
  • (X_2) represents the rate of unemployment (%). b. Interpretation of the coefficient values:
  • The intercept (653.469): This is the estimated demand for housing when both the interest rate and unemployment rate are zero. However, in the context of this problem, it may not have a practical interpretation since interest rates and unemployment rates are unlikely to be zero in the real world.
  • Interest Rate Coefficient (-53.523): This coefficient suggests that for each one-unit increase in the current interest rate (measured in percentage points), the estimated demand for housing decreases by approximately 53.523 units, all else being equal. In other words, higher interest rates are associated with lower demand for housing.
  • Unemployment Rate Coefficient (-11.028): This coefficient suggests that for each one-unit increase in the rate of unemployment (measured in percentage points), the estimated demand for housing decreases by approximately 11.028 units, all else being equal. This indicates that higher unemployment rates are associated with lower demand for housing. c. Comment on the overall strength of the model from the ANOVA table: The ANOVA table provides information about the overall strength of the model. In this case:
  • The Multiple R (correlation coefficient) is 0.923, which is close to 1. This suggests a strong positive linear relationship between the independent variables (interest rate and unemployment rate) and the dependent variable (demand for housing).
  • The R-squared (R^2) value is 0.852, indicating that approximately 85.2% of the variation in the demand for housing can be explained by the linear regression model using interest rate and unemployment rate as predictors. This is a relatively high R-squared value, indicating that the model does a good job of explaining the variation in housing demand.
  • The Adjusted R-squared is 0.754, which is still relatively high and suggests that the model is a good fit for the data. d. Comment about the significance of the regression coefficients: Looking at the significance of the coefficients:
  • The p-value associated with the intercept is 0.039, which is less than the common significance level of 0.05. This indicates that the intercept is statistically significant.
  • The p-value for the coefficient of the interest rate is 0.084, which is greater than 0.05. This suggests that the interest rate variable may not be statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level. However, it's important to note that the significance level is somewhat close to 0.05, so it may still have some practical importance.
  • The p-value for the coefficient of the unemployment rate is 0.069, which is also greater than 0.05 but relatively close to it. Similar to the interest rate variable, this suggests that the unemployment rate variable may not be statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level, but it is worth considering its practical importance. In summary, while the model as a whole is strong (as indicated by the high R-squared value), the statistical significance of the individual coefficients, especially for interest rate and unemployment rate, may require further examination and consideration of the specific context of the study.