

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Project; Class: Reflective/Inquiring Educator; Subject: Curriculum and Instruction; University: Wichita State University; Term: Fall 2006;
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
qkdctb-482213-2767288-ci-20731-20annotated-20bib-20rubric-20revised-doc.doc
Level Criterion/Requirement Annotations (70%) 4 Required number of sources, nearly all scholarly secondary sources (or primary sources, where available and appropriate); no more than one tertiary source; annotation shows careful reading, a summary, an assessment, and a reflection showing clear understanding of source content, quality, and relevance. 3 Required number of sources, nearly all scholarly secondary sources (or primary sources, where available and appropriate); no more than one tertiary source; annotation shows reading and understanding of source content, quality, and relevance. 2 Required number of sources, over half scholarly secondary sources (or primary sources, where available and appropriate); no more than two tertiary sources; annotation shows reading and understanding of source content, quality, and relevance, with weaknesses or omissions in no more than one or two entries. 1 Fewer than required number of sources, only one or two scholarly secondary sources (or primary sources, where available and appropriate); several tertiary or irrelevant sources; annotation shows superficial or no reading and understanding of source content, quality, and relevance, with weaknesses or omissions in most entries. Bibliographic format (20%) 4 All citations are correctly cited following a standard bibliographic format. 3 All citations are cited following a standard bibliographic format with no more than two types of errors. 2 Citations follow a standard bibliographic format with several types of citation errors. 1 Citations follow no discernible bibliographic format or pattern of frequent and numerous types of citation errors. Submission (10%) 4 Paper neatly typed and formatted according to assignment guidelines; electronic file clearly named according to Electronic Submission guidelines—Lastname AnnotatedBib; Digital Drop Box; student name, E-mail address, Course and Section, Assignment, and Date clearly indicated on title page; if working with a team, team cited. 3 Paper typed and formatted according to assignment guidelines with very few errors; electronic file clearly named according to Electronic Submission guidelines; Digital Drop Box used if available; no more than one of the above elements missing 2 Paper typed and formatted with some errors; filename vague, misleading, or incomplete; student uses floppy or e-mail attachment; one or two of the above elements missing 1 Paper not typed, or typed with numerous errors; format guidelines not followed; no electronic version submitted; more than two of the above elements missing Modified from: John I Brooks III, http://faculty.uncfsu.edu/jibrooks/FRMS/rubricrsrch.htm qkdctb-482213-2767288-ci-20731-20annotated-20bib-20rubric-20revised-doc.doc