






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The implementation of Te Whāriki curriculum in Early Childhood Education (ECE) and the challenges faced by educators. The document emphasizes the importance of creating a supportive learning environment for infants and children, developing their symbolic life, and addressing persistent issues in implementation for Māori and Pacific children and those with special educational needs. It also explores the need for professional development and the development of assessment tools for evaluating curriculum implementation.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 12
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Anne Meade
PhD in ECE, and registered teacher with ECE and school teaching qualifications
( Te Whāriki , 1996, p. 9)
(Tilly Reedy)
An example of pedagogical guidance. Programmes for infants must provide:
One-to-one responsive interactions An adult who’s consistently responsible for each infant Sociable, loving and physically responsive adults who tune into an infant’s needs Programmes adjust to the infant’s rhythm Partnership between parents and other adults involved. (Excerpts, Te Whāriki , p. 22. Influenced by Pikler principles.)
Learning leads development
Developing the symbolic life of the child
Learning by active participation. the highest form of learning.
Photos from Daisies EE&C Centre, with permission
Te Whāriki outcome: children learn strategies for active exploration, thinking, and reasoning. (Exploration) Children develop skills in using the counting system and mathematical symbols and concepts. (Communication)
The ECE Taskforce in NZ (2012) identified persistent issues in its implementation for: Māori and Pacific children, and Children with special educational needs.
Other critiques include: An overemphasis on recording dispositional outcomes at the expense of ‘working theories’ ERO’s evaluation reports show, e.g., enacted curricula are often a truncated whāriki One approach – narrative assessment – dominates Progressions in learning are seldom explicit in documentation of learning.
To me, the report on Working with Te Whāriki (ERO,
work with Te Whāriki, a non-prescriptive curriculum framework, and design their own curriculum that is fit-for-purpose for those families who are enrolled
implement a rich, broad, complex curriculum for all
report the learning progress and outcomes to parents regularly, as well as to schools when the child transitions to school.
How would we assess: strengthening of mana? Would ECE for 3 and 4 year olds be privileged at the expense of infants and toddlers if measures of learning outcomes were used before starting school? Who could or would develop indicators for valued outcomes like, “ Has strategies for active exploration ”? How would we ensure that assessments don’t put positive dispositions toward learning at risk? What about the “tapestry for life”? (Tilly Reedy)