


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
How body size, temperature, and endothermy/ectothermy influence metabolic rate. It discusses the scaling of 'mass-specific' metabolic rates, the differences in metabolic rates between endotherms and ectotherms, and the impact of these differences on organisms and ecosystems. The document also introduces the concept of allometric functions and provides examples of metabolic rates for various taxa.
What you will learn
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
® R. B.Huey
Goals for This Lecture:
I. How body size and endothermy/ectothermy influence metabolic rate (SN192-198)
body temperature via adjustments in metabolic heat production.
body temperature depends mainly on external sources of heat
B. Because many factors influence metabolic rate (see Metabolism I), metabolic comparisons
must be based on standardized conditions. Which are:
sleep period, in thermal neutral zone (“tnz”), non-reproductive, not growing. 2. Standard
metabolic rate (SMR) for ectotherms. Animal should be fasting, resting, non-
reproductive. In reporting SMR, the ectotherm’s temperature must be reported_. Why?_
decreases below the thermal neutral zone?
C. Body mass (size) is the dominant influence on whole-animal metabolism. How does
metabolic rate change (“scale) with body size? For example, if species A is twice as heav y as
species B, is the metabolic rate of A twice that of B?
sized animals (text Table 5.8). Then we fit a “power” or “allometric” function (E
= a M
b ,
see and the Allometry “handout” ), which conveniently summarizes all these data.
case, the relationship will be a straight line, as shown on the figure on the next page.
metabolic rate increases with body size, but not in a constant proportion, such that the line
isn’t straight but is curved. Thus the metabolic rate of species B isn’t twice that of A but
is something less than that.
D. Typical values for vertebrates, where E
in ml O 2
h
, M in grams
Taxon a b time (h) for a 1 g animal
to use 10 ml O 2
Endotherms
passerine bird (42°C) 7.5 .72 1.
placental mammal(37°C) 3.8 .75 2.
marsupial (35°C) 2.3 .75 4.
average = 4.5 .74 2.
Ectotherms
lizard (37°C) .42 .82 23.
frog (ranid) (25°C) .29 .75? calculate
fish (25°C) .20 .70 50
beetles (22-25°C) .23 .86? calculate
average = 0.4 .78 43.
( Exercises: 1) fill in the "?" values in the table using the allometric values given, 2) calculate the times
for a 100-g animal of each taxon to use 10 ml O 2
E. Key generalizations
metabolic rate increases with mass but not in direct proportion to mass.
equivalent size (thus larger "a" by about 10 times on average!). A huge difference.
than do unicellular ectotherms (Fig. 5.11)
not 100%. A necessary consequence is that 1 g of tissue of the small animal must have a
higher metabolic rate than 1 g of the large animal tissue. (Figs. 5.9, 5.10)
for mouse, .21 for cat, .11 for human, .05 for cow, .03 for elephant.
is producing ~20X (20 times, not %!) heat per unit time as a gram of elephant.
food per day, whereas a large elephant doesn't (fortunately for zoos and for Africa).
4 Metabolic rate per gram of animal, is called mass-specific metabolic rate.
C. The scaling of mass-specific E
can be described by a power function. (Simply divide both
sides of the whole-animal metabolic equation by M. Thus, for placental mammals, E
-.
or for lizards = 0.42M
-.
). [ Be able to graph this on arithmetic and log-log axes.]
D. This "inverse" relationship holds for all organisms. (because all b < 1).
IV. How metabolic rates of “free ranging” animals compare with those in the lab?
A. Typical metabolic data are from animals at rest in the lab & necessarily underestimate
metabolic rates of animals in nature, which are moving and digesting, at least part of the time.
By how much do lab measurements underestimate metabolism of free ranging animals?
B. Dual-isotope technique ("doubly-labeled" water, a special “handout” will be available ) is
now used to estimate metabolic rates (FMR) of free ranging animals in nature.
C. Example: Bennett and Nagy (1977) compared lizard, bird, mammal -- all about 12 g in mass.
Lizard had low T b
(= body temperature) at night. First, Bennett & Nagy calculated metabolic
rate based on lab studies and field T b
profiles, then based on isotope studies.
reflect greater activity birds and mammals and to the lowering of T b
by lizard at night.
D. Ecological and physiological (see below) consequences of high metabolic rates of endotherms
must be profound. They have high impact on the environment (require lots of food and O 2
and the activity of their physiological systems (respiratory, circulatory, osmoregulatory,
digestive) must be very high.
E. Study the appendix on field metabolic rates – you should understand how doubly labeled watr
works.